![]()
May i just say that, despite all said (which i duelly - er - dually - oh, whatever - respect) i can't agree more.
I have to congratulate you, as a 13-year-old (ha, i got that right yet?), you tend to say very wise things. apparently horses have no concept of hitting as punishment. in their eyes, perhaps you weren't aware of their space for a moment, they stepped on your foot and they got a wallop - for all they know they're thinking " now what the hell did you do that for mum? you try to pretend that you presence means safety and you want me to trust you, yet after all we've gone through you go and hurt me for no reason?"
with NH practitioners (and I'm talking specifically about Michael peace and Kelly Marks ditto-ers here) rather than focus on points to improve and punishing what is right and ignoring - somtimes praising - (after all, we don't praise every right move, do we? it just wouldn't be practical) which sets a black and white picture for hroses (supposedly a logical and suitable thing to do), they praise what is right and correct the undesired doings. that is what horses do with each other. they don't punish each other, it is just not a conecept they use nor find efficient. when a horse experiences something unpleasant (i.e. a whipping for refusing a fence), he learns not that refusing was, at that time, wrong but that jumping is an unpleasant experience he would rather not repeat again and will try to avoid from now on, because it threatens his means for survival.
apparently hitting horses loses any trust gained and a hors ecan never fully truat a person who he knows may hit him, for what he know not (Hey that rhymes!)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks, I think four years with Mayo qualifies me to come over a little at least of knowing what I'm talking about just not in his company